Ubuntu Asks Users “What Do You Want?”
Posted by Dejoe John in Tech Update, tags: downloadsquad, Linux, lockergnome, UbuntuUbuntu has done more for Linux adoption than any other distribution, and that is more than a matter of how much money mark Shuttleworth has thrown into the mix. It is a benefit of being the distribution that was not afraid to use things that were not open-source when it was clear that they were needed, like drivers.
Now, on its way to releasing another long term support version of Ubuntu (10.04) the company is asking prospective users what they would like to see included with it. The choices given are closed source, and not all free, which may be upsetting to some, but are going to be necessary if Linux is to grow further. Some of the choices are outlined, and the effects are shown in an article from Download Squad -
To say Ubuntu has a dedicated fan base is probably a bit of an understatement. As the most widely-recognized Linux distribution, Ubuntu has helped push Linux beyond the fringe of desktop computer use.
But because it’s Linux — and because Linux and open source are intertwined so tightly in the minds of many — things get a little dicey when there’s mention of closed source software being packaged with Ubuntu by default.
Take the recent survey they posted. It’s a reasonable enough request - which apps would you like to see in Ubuntu which currently aren’t available? Where the trouble arises is with the selections listed in the survey, apparently: Photoshop, iTunes, Skype, Hulu.
Oh god, no! What the hell are they thinking?!
I’ll tell you what. They’re thinking that Ubuntu needs those apps in order to appeal to a much broader group of people. Windows still owns the desktop computer market, and the lack of recognizable apps like iTunes keeps many people from even considering Linux as an alternative.
It’s the truth, whether the Ubuntu community wants to admit it or not. I’ve tried to extol the virtues of Linux to plenty of retail customers and more than one has replied “can I run iTunes on it?” When I say no, their interest disappears completely.
Bringing apps like those mentioned would be a bold move by Canonical, but one that would indeed pay off in the long run.
This would be a very good thing for many, because some people are so wed to one or two applications that they are totally familiar with them, and the problem has been that releases of open-source work-alikes fall into the “close, but no cigar” category. By giving those people the real thing, the last point of hold out for many is removed.

Entries (RSS)