Saturday, Jul 31, 2010
Login

Posts Tagged ‘browsers’

TweetDeck Coming To Mobile Web Browsers

TweetDeck, a very successful and great Twitter client, announced it has plans to make TweetDeck into a mobile browser-based web application that can run on almost any mobile web enabled device. By focusing on building an application for a mobile browser, TweetDeck hopes to expand the platforms that it is on to increase their online presence. TweetDeck already has applications on the iPhone and iPad, with future plans for an Android app. Since TweetDeck would have a really hard time creating apps for every single smart phone out there they have logically decided to go with a web based apps to make their lives easier.

By producing a web-based app, TweetDeck will be able to support many smart phone platforms including, Windows Mobile, BlackBerry, Symbian and webOS. The mobile web app strategy has other benefits too, including improved battery life and overall performance of the smartphone it is running on. Right now, TweetDeck is working on a basic mobile site that will provide customizations for many different platforms so that the devices can preform better.


Mozilla Asks Users to Support Browser Add-ons

Developers building functional add-ons for the Firefox browser can request financial contributions from users through an effort launched this week by Mozilla.

The Contributions Pilot Program is billed as a way for developers to showcase themselves next to their Add-ons and receive a suggested contribution for their work, via PayPal. With the Contributions feature, developers can tell the story of what motivated them to build an Add-on.

“The Contributions Pilot explores how we can help our add-ons ecosystem by allowing developers to request financial participation from satisfied users,” said Nick Nguyen, director of Add-ons at Mozilla.

“Since Firefox launched, thousands of add-ons have been created to add new features to the Web browser. These features include Twitter clients, bookmark and search assistants, and some of the most widely used Web development tools in the industry,” Nyugen said.

“Contributions are always optional, there is no way to require a user to make a payment in order to enable access or additional features,” Nyugen said. A blog detailing the specifics of the program was posted by the Firefox Add-ons team on Thursday.

The add-ons community, according to Mozilla, is a source of innovation for Firefox users. Add-ons foreshadow the future of Web browsers, and until introduction of the Contributions program, developers had few options for financial support.

The Contributions effort differs from the Mozilla Jetpack program for browser add-on development in that Jetpack is intended to grow the audience of potential developers by making it easier to build browser enhancements.


View Many Firefox Tabs at Once With Split Browser

Is your Firefox browser cramping your style? Split Browser just might be able to help. This free add-on lets you split the content area of your browser into as many windows as you’d like, allowing you to see more information at once.

To use Split Browser, you’ll need to have at least two browser tabs open. Once the add-on is installed, it adds a new option, called Split, to your Firefox menu. To split your browser window into two separate panes, you simply select “Split Current Tab to” from the new Split menu. Your two tabs are now merged into one, with the screen split between the two of them. You can select the position of the panes (top, bottom, left, or right) from within the Split menu.

This allows you to compare two Web pages side-by-side, or to leave one Web page open and viewable while you browse other sites. This could be handy if you want to continually monitor a browser-based e-mail account or a calendar, for example. Sure, you could toggle between browser tabs–or even browser windows–to accomplish the same task, but Split Browser’s approach is much more streamlined.

Split Browser allows you to split your Firefox window as many times as your system’s memory will support. On my test system’s 17-inch display, though, I found that displaying four different sites was the maximum before they became too small to be of any use.


Google Chrome Is Fastest Browser in Site-Loading Tests

Last fall, Google claimed that its Chrome 2 Beta browser was “many times faster” than rival browsers at running JavaScript. In February, as it launched the beta of its new browser, Apple asserted that Safari 4 Beta was the world’s fastest browser. And this month, Microsoft started marketing Internet Explorer 8 with videos purporting to prove that it’s faster than its rivals.

Speed test results; click for full-size image.They can’t all be right, so PC World undertook detailed real-world tests to determine how quickly each of four browsers–the three mentioned above and Firefox 3.0.7–loaded a series of popular Web sites. The results: Google Chrome 2 Beta beat the field. Its average page load speed for our nine test sites was 1.3 seconds, half a second faster than runner-up IE 8. Safari and Firefox tied for last with an average loading time of 2.12 seconds for each of the test sites. Detailed test results for each browser appear in the accompanying table.

We saw the most significant difference in page load times with the English-language Wikipedia home page and the MySpace home page.

Chrome 2 Beta completed the job of loading Wikipedia in a mere 1.12 seconds, easily outpacing the competition. Internet Explorer 8 chugged to a second-place finish, loading the page in 2.24 seconds on average. Firefox 3.0.7 and Safari 4 Beta lagged behind, however, with average load times of 3.31 seconds and 3.38 seconds, respectively.

Chrome 2 also dusted the competition in loading the MySpace home page, getting it done in an average time of 1.43 seconds. Internet Explorer 8 loaded the page in 2.59 seconds, while Firefox took nearly 3 seconds on average, and Safari well over 4 seconds.

Safari’s overall results were disappointing, especially given Apple’s claim that Safari is the fastest browser on the market. To its credit, though, Safari did load the Amazon home page faster than any of its three competitors.

Our Speed-Test Methodology

In our browser speed comparison, we pitted a near-final build of Internet Explorer 8 against Firefox 3.0.7 (the current nonbeta version of Mozilla’s browser), the beta version of Chrome 2, and the beta of Safari 4. We used a set of nine popular Web sites in our testing: Amazon, MySpace, Yahoo, PC World, YouTube, Microsoft, Apple, eBay, and Wikipedia’s English-language home page. To ensure that we measured the page-loading times as accurately as possible, we recorded our testing sessions on video for review later on.

We performed all of our testing on a Gateway P-7811FX notebook running a clean installation of Windows Vista Service Pack 1; we reinstalled the operating system before testing each browser. For each browser, we cleared the browser’s cache and then loaded each page in our test suite. We repeated the process ten times per site per browser to ensure accurate results, to factor out fluctuations in network traffic, and to build a sufficiently large sample size to identify trends. In addition, we threw out the two best and the two worst scores for each page load test to further reduce the influence of fluctuations and to produce more consistent results.

Some browsers will report that a page has finished loading even though parts of the page haven’t yet appeared. We didn’t base our determination of when a page was loaded on the browser’s opinion. Instead, we relied on whether all visual elements of the page were loaded and ready to use. For example, on Apple’s home page, we judged the page to be ready when all of its graphics and images were loaded, and when the custom search field was ready to use.

Faster, But Should You Care?

The ironic thing about browser makers’ speed claims is that many users probably won’t notice the difference between the fastest and slowest browsers in our tests. What with fast broadband connections and a bunch of pretty peppy browsers to choose from, few of us spend a lot of time waiting for pages to load. On the other hand, if you’re stuck on a slow connection, not even the fastest browser in the world will help you.

Our conclusion: All four of the modern browsers we tested are fast enough that the key factor to consider in determining which one to use shouldn’t be “Which one’s fastest?” Rather, you should ask “Which one do I like most?” “Which has the features I need?” and “Which one is safest?” That said, it is encouraging to see browser vendors compete with each other, and aim to ship the fastest Web browsers they possibly can.


Browser Showdown: IE 8 vs. Firefox

Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 is here at last–the newest entry into the ongoing browser wars. Microsoft packed a healthy number of new features into IE 8, and made security a top priority in its newest version of this venerable Web browser.

But just as important as all that is browsing speed–that is, how quickly can IE 8 render your favorite Web sites? To get an idea of how IE 8 compares, we put it to the test.

Our Speed-Test Methodology


In our browser speed comparison, we pitted a near-final build of Internet Explorer 8 against Firefox 3.0.7, the current non-beta version of Mozilla’s browser. We used a set of nine popular Web sites in our testing: Amazon, MySpace, Yahoo, PC World, YouTube, Microsoft, Apple, eBay, and Wikipedia. To ensure we could gather as accurate page-loading times as possible, we recorded our testing sessions for review later on.

We loaded each site ten times in each of the browsers and repeated the process the following day to rule out any network traffic or server issues. Prior to each test run, we cleared the browsers’ caches as well. We also repeated the load tests to ensure that we had sufficient data to identify loading speed trends. To ensure consistent results, we performed testing on a fresh Windows Vista installation, and we reinstalled the operating system before each round of testing. Additionally, we removed the two best and two worst scores for each page load test to produce more consistent results.

Browser testing can be tricky, as different browsers measure page loading progress differently, so getting a read of page load times strictly by the browser’s progress bar could result in inaccurate or inconsistent results. Have all the images appeared? Are there elements of the page that have yet to load even though the browser’s status indicator suggests otherwise? These are questions we take into account when testing browsers. Given this, we took into account visual indications of a page’s loading progress, rather than relying on what the browser’s progress bars told us.

The Speed-Test Results

By and large, we found that Internet Explorer 8 performed well, and beat out Firefox 3.0.7 in the majority of our time trials.

However, IE 8′s performance advantage is relatively negligible. In most of our testing, IE 8′s advantage was half a second or less. One notable exception, however, was in loading the English-language Wikipedia home page, where IE 8 beat out Firefox by an average of one second (IE 8 took about 2.2 seconds to load the page on average, while Firefox 3 took about 3.3 seconds). Also of note: on average, IE 8 loaded Apple’s home page nearly twice as quickly as Firefox.

IE 8 is Faster, But Will You Notice?

In practical, everyday use, you likely won’t notice much of a difference between IE 8 and Firefox 3. Due to the fact that broadband connections are so commonplace today, and the fact that browsers in general can load pages faster than they could even a couple years ago, the page load time differences between the two are relatively moot. If you use Firefox and are happy with it, you may as well stick with it. That said, it is encouraging to see browser vendors compete with each other, and aim to ship the fastest Web browsers they possibly can.