Saturday, Jul 31, 2010
Login

Author Archive

CCIE Lab Fees Reduced

There are times that news is just too important to hold off on writing about it until the next release of the CCIE Flyer. Well this is one of those times! I have been monitoring some of the on-line forums and twitter etc…and I have heard that Cisco is going to lower the fee to $1,000 from $1,400 for the lab! Wow this is great and congratulations Cisco for doing this. I saw recently that the declining numbers in the CCIE population have caused the post on these numbers te be removed. This was a shock to me because I was putting together a presentation for Western European emerging markets I am delivering in two weeks. As I searched for the details from the normal site O realized it was no longer there. So I am concerned that maybe someone decided to stop posting bad news. Well the good news is that in other emerging markets the populations numbers are still slowly growing. So there American fat cats take that! (I did take a look at my scales before making that comment by BTW and sadly yes I am a fat cat here in the USA to)

I digress

The point is that I just today received an email from an aspiring dual CCIE from Africa. This engineer had to sell his TV and entertainment systems to pay for a lab. Taking this guy’s money was like stealing candy from a baby. I urge he gets it back but the system works as it does and I have no real influence, but you do. You the CCIEs and Cisco engineers out there in the world can wag the dog. You are a mighty big dog that influences the purchasing decisions of corporations that influence commerce around the world. You the lowly Cisco network engineers. It seems some of you have been heard because I hev heard it through the grapevine that Cisco is lowering the price for the CCIE labs to $1,000. This is a great next step after the Waiver and the Core Knowledge Questions (OEQs) have passed into history.

Kudos, Props and Thanks

Really. I was so excited I had a Margarita with lunch. Kudos Learning at Cisco, Props management teams that took this challenge on and Thanks to the rest of you who made this possible. I have even read that this was going to be announced at Cisco Live in June. Wow, it’s only May and we are talking about it already.

CCIE Population Numbers

At a time when the numbers are on the decline and published and unpublished efforts have been made to keep the certifications pure this is a great move. Hello, I am a recruiter and given bodies to recruit I get all pimply and excited. So getting the numbers up using an equation that includes discounts is a recipe for success.

So let’s all look forward to the announcement in June at Cisco Live – Networkers. See you there!


Cisco 360 – Lab 28 -TS

1)  Local Ping – Framerelay
2)  Get away with inverse-arp. Create p2p sub interfaces and assign DLCIs to that. So the router wouldn’t inverse arp for those DLCIs
3)  VTP Pruning
4)  Inconsistent Allowed Vlans on 2 switches will cause them not to agree on root for the other vlans which aren’t allowed on the trunk
5)  OSPF – Router ID, Virtual Link
6)  Borascast to Point-to-point Mismatch. Change!
7)  External metric for a route should be same at 2 different routers in OSPF.Use E2. !
8)  EIGRP neighbor command missing
9)  Redistribution delay parameter is in TENS of Microseconds.!
10) RIP – Incorrect Passiver Interfaces
11) Framerelay traffic shapping, adaptive shaping, fragment, tc-10ms, fairqueue
12) DHCP – client identifier, default-router error


Cisco 360 – Lab 27 TS

Cisco 360 – Lab 27 KREEEKs.!
1)  IP Address Mismatch
2)  Clock Rate
3)  No Shut on interfaces
4)  Etherchannel LACP passive-passive both sides. So no negotiation
5)  SVI protocol line DOWN. Vlan not there? why? vtp password not there.!
6)  Native Vlan Mismatch
7)  Aging Default 300 sec. change to 300/2!
8)  OSPF Network types Mismatch
9)  Network Statement Error in OSPF
10) Autocost reference bandwidth 1gbps link should be cost of 1. So 1000!
11) Ipv6- accesslist denying UDP- ripng not working
12) QOS – absolute bandwidth specified instead of percentages
13) QOS – Voice priority
14) NTP – Unsync’ed SERVER.
15) NTP bad password


Narbik’s 7hr RIP Lab.!

Narbik says :

This lab is part of my new  Boot Camp 2.0  work book, the idea of this work
book is to explore every option within every item in the blueprint, this lab
covers RIPv2 ONLY.

The combination of my  Advanced CCIE Routing and Switching 2.0 ,
Troubleshooting Work Book, which contains 10 six-eight hour Troubleshooting
labs and my new  Boot Camp 2.0  work book will increase your chances of
passing this  ridiculously easy  certification.

How long does it take to complete this lab?

It all depends on how prepared you are, if you NOT prepared and you are at a
CCNP level it can take up to 7 hours to complete, some students don t even
complete the entire lab. But if you are almost ready, it should NOT take you
longer than 4 hours to complete this lab.

How should I do this lab?

My recommendation:

- You have a topology.doc file, print the file and look at the topology
as you configure the lab.
- You have a  initial-config  directory, which contains all the initial
configuration files, open the  RIPv2-Init.txt  and copy and paste the
configuration onto the routers and begin the lab.
- You should use the  Questions.pdf  when you are configuring the lab,
and before you move on to another task, read the  Questions-Answers.pdf
and
compare the answers.

Once you complete this lab, you should have confidence about your knowledge
of this routing protocol.

Please do not hesitate to share this lab with friends or even share it on
your blog (If you have one).

Download it here


MPLS LDP /32 Route

Make sure the LDP Router-ID exists in the routing table of the peer as a /32[host] route. else in sh mpls ldp discovery detail you will get the following error.

R4#sh mpls ldp discovery
Local LDP Identifier:
4.4.4.4:0
Discovery Sources:
Interfaces:
Ethernet0/0 (ldp): xmit/recv
LDP Id: 6.6.6.6:0; no host route